Time and date: 6.30pm -7.30pm: Friday 20th June 2014
Location: Room A130, College Building, City University, St. John Street, London EC1V 4PB
1. Opening remarks/welcome
The Chair, Pavlos Filippopoulos welcomed all those present.
2. Apologies: Greg Madison, Simon du Plock, Donna Billington, Murray Blacket, Susan Iacovou, Derek Bean, Emmy van Deurzen, Helen Storey
3. Minutes of 2013 AGM: Corrections
None
4. Matters arising from the 2012 minutes:
None
5. Reports from:
Chair: Pavlos Filippopoulos.
One of the most important developments to have taken place in the last year was the renaming of the College of Constructivist Psychotherapies into The Constructivist and Existential College (CEC), thanks to the efforts of Paul McGinley who is also the Chair elect of the CEC. We have also been restructuring the SEA committee in order to be able to function more efficiently in terms of the needs of our Society.
The SEA is a portal for news around the existential world, for psychotherapists and beyond. We communicate with members in various ways: through an excellent Journal which is an important reflective space; through giving members financial support in the form of scholarships; through the annual conference and other CPD events (previously for a and discussion groups), which we are currently in the process of restructuring in order to make them more useful and informative to members. We have recently updated our website, which now has it’s own server, and we are looking to make it more comprehensive and to participate in various internet-based forums and other social media so that we can extend our communication with and between our members and with the world of existential thought.
The 1st World Congress for Existential Psychotherapy will be held in London next year and the SEA will have a presence in that.
The SEA committee has been extremely responsive to Pavlos’ questions and has offered a lot of support to him in his first year as Chair.
-
Treasurer: Paola Pomponi.
Tamara Sears wanted to know whether there was scope to spend some of the money being accumulated by the SEA. Paola discussed the possibility of using some of it to fund research, as has happened in the past; also using it to fund CPD events and for future UKCP requirements. The profits from last year’s conference will be carried into this year’s conference, possibly through funding student tickets. The SEA could also advertise for people doing research and support them with funding. Sarah Young also mentioned that in the past the AGM used to be more of an event, with dinner afterwards and that this is a way of giving something back to members.
-
Membership Secretary: Paul Silver-Myer
SEA – AGM 2014
May I place on record my thanks to Ursula for her meticulous records that have made things clear and easy for me.
Last year Ursula reported that we had 375 members and this year, as per table one, we again have 375 members. However, as Mark Twain might have observed, this statistic is not all what it appears to be.
So in table two you start to get an idea of the movement between the membership categories. International members are down by four whilst students are up by seven.
Further clarification can be seen in table three. Whilst we welcomed a total of 71 new members including 13 whose earlier membership had previously lapsed, we also saw 66 people leave the society during the year.
This churn, representing around 17.5% of our total membership, may well be typical of a society such as ours, but is something we nevertheless may wish to be aware of.
The movement is expanded in table four where, although we lost and gained virtually the same number of international members, that figure of 20 against a total international membership of 50, represents a swing of 40%. The New School and Regents were responsible for the vast majority of the 33 new students, though we still lost 22. I have started to ask people to let me know the reasons for ceasing membership with us, and although most do not reply, I have received comments about retirement, moving abroad, and the lack of value for their particular needs.
I operated a three reminders and out policy, which resulted in an average time it took for a member to pay their fee, of just over a month.
And on the last page, table five gives you an idea as to how much revenue each category of member brings in to the society. Full members bring in just over £11k which represents around 60% of the total membership income.
Finally, a request, please do inform us when you move house or change or e-mail address.
-
Conference Organiser: Murray Blacket (via email)
I see the SEA 2014 conference as somewhat of a challenge to the SEA. Having reached our 25th year, it might be easy to become increasingly comfortable with the existential position. We’re different. We’re the jazz of therapy. We’re anti-research. Outcomes research? Pah! But in these “assumptions” is a cosiness that hinders growth and rewards stasis. This holds us back from facing difficult questions besetting us as society and all other therapeutic modalities. SEA 2014 offers the chance to draw on a wide scope of speakers. Some might not be existential but raise some challenging existential questions. So where last year was somewhat of a celebration, this year’s Conference begins a new era of exploration. And in this brave new era you are all invited to become existential Star Trekkers and assist with the rebuilding and refitting of our Existential Mothership.
Conference theme: TRUTH OR DARE
As therapists we deal in part-knowledge. Client’s phenomena show in glimpses. What is experienced is understood historically. So how do we arrive at our own truths? Whether they be epistemological, ontological, research-based or lived. Quite simply, what do we know? And more importantly how do we know it? This conference looks at knowledge in its multifarious forms and welcomes and encourages papers from all points of view. As a broad church, existential psychotherapy already embraces many points of view. And as a Society our charter is to push these boundaries further. But if we do, how might this newfound knowledge help, impede and impact on our work? And can we live with that uncertainty?
Bernie Joy brought up the fact that with the conference always taking place on a Sunday some orthodox Jewish members are never able to attend. He would like the organisers to consider changing the day to a Sunday in future. We can try this next year and see how it impacts attendance figures. The date and venue have already been booked for this year and cannot be changed.
-
UKCP Registration Officers: Mike Harding and Donna Billington.
The SEA currently registers 112 members with the UKCP, with one further application pending formal approval. It is expected that the 11 current ADEP students will be eligible for registration in May 2015.
During the past month (May 2014) both the ADEP programme and the SEA have been subject to the UKCP’s Quinquennial Review. While their formal report has yet to be delivered, the initial feedback given by the panel members of the UKCP/CCET was extremely positive for both the ADEP team at Regent’s University London, and the SEA in their capacity as an accrediting body. However, while very few procedural changes were requested for the future, these will have an impact on the SEA’s ability to accredit other Existential training courses in the immediate future. These essentially devolve to practical issues, mainly the SEA’s ability to provide the time and effort both to formally review any such programmes, and to provide necessary personnel to attend the regular Boards of Study and Examination held by other training agencies. With regard to the ADEP programme, the panel required that the SEA’s input to the training and examination of its students was to be put on a more formal footing. This requires the SEA to have fuller access to the individual students’ records -normally held within Registry – so as to better appraise the process as a whole and thus being in a position to assess the on-going procedures of the ADEP course committee, and which requires SEA representatives to attend appropriate meetings in a formal capacity. This has been accepted by the ADEP course leader, and will be implemented.
While, in essence, the SEA remains free to accredit any suitable Existential training programme, it is clear that its procedures must follow those now required for its assessment of the ADEP course. Obviously, each potential course will be assessed on its own merits, but the assessment of such a course will have to follow the procedures laid down by the UKCP/CCET for ADEP. Thus, for the reasons given above the SEA is not, at this moment, able to undertake such work, though it has to be said that it has not been approached to do so, and it is hoped that its Committee will at some point be enlarged to allow this to happen in the event of a request.
What will this entail? Firstly, any course will have to be formally approved, and repeated at five-year intervals. The documentation for this currently runs to some 200 pages, and in this respect we would like to thank Paul McGinley, Natasha Synesiou, and Paola Pomponi for the SEA, and Jonathan Hall for ADEP, for all the work they have put into the documentation for the Quinquennial Review.
Digby Tantam said he found it strange that the SEA was so involved with one course and one university and that it was not consistent with the constitution to be linked only to one training or university. There was a discussion around the stipulations of the original constitution and the possibility of changing the constitution to reflect the natural progression of events. Historically there have been close links between the SEA committee and the ADEP as several committee members teach on it.
If a formal application was made for a course to be accredited/validated through the SEA it would be considered, but so far no one has approached us. There was further discussion on whether we should drop the validating process or invest in it and validate more courses, outside of the ADEP. Paola pointed out that UKCP registration also generates income for the SEA.
f. SEA Hans W. Cohn Scholarship officer: Sarah Young
In January 2014 the SEA/HWC Scholarship sub- committee, after thoroughly assessing the applications and following some discussion, agreed to make 3 awards:
I. £4,000 awarded to a student to cover the cost of 4 modules of academic supervision so that she can complete her research for the DPsych in Existential Counselling Psychology at the New School of Psychotherapy and Counselling. Her thesis is titled ‘Working Within the Limits of Time: an existential-phenomenological exploration of the experience of existential practitioners working in a time-limited context’.
ii. £3,000 pa for 2 years awarded to a student to cover the cost of half the fees on the Advanced Diploma in Existential Psychotherapy at the Regent’s School of Psychotherapy & Psychology. She is a Family Specialist working with The Pears National Centre for Autism Education where she has set up Family Support Seminars.
Iii. £3,000 awarded to a student so that she can complete her research for the DPsych in Existential Counselling at the New School of Psychotherapy & Counselling. Her thesis is titled ‘Trans’ sexuality: A Phenomenological-Hermeneutic Enquiry into the Sexuality of Trans People with Implications for the practice of Existential-Phenomenological Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy’. She has already published papers on the subject including two in Existential Analysis.
The Sub-committee consisted of: Pavlos Filippopoulos, Derek Bean and Linda Stephenson (a past recipient of the HWC Scholarship).
Digby Tantam thanked the SEA on the students’ behalf, as they had had to drop out because of lack of funding and are now able to complete their studies.
g. SEA Journal Editors: Greg Madison, Simon du Plock (via email)
Existential Analysis
Journal report to SEA AGM June 20, 2014
Greg Madison, Simon du Plock, Co-Editors
Editorial Board – this year we have not had any additions to our EB. Unfortunately Prof. Les Todres, having retired from his position at Bournemouth University, has also decided to retire from our EB.
Reader’s Panel – we remain pushed for reliable readers who will get submissions back to us in a timely manner with appropriate feedback. As a Journal team we are looking at ways to streamline the review process so that authors get appropriate feedback quickly.
New Review Coordinator – Helen Acton has done a tremendous job coordinating reviews over the past three years. She has now decided to hand on the baton to a new person. Helen is submitting a brief description of the role and her experience to Hermeneutic Circular and we invite applications from anyone interested in joining our Team as the Review Coordinator. We would consider a job-share if there are two people interested in taking on the role.
Quality of submissions – While the quality of articles remains high, the editors would encourage input on ‘academic conventions’ in our postgraduate courses so that existential authors and reviewers are better prepared to give and receive feedback and to participate in respectful academic dialogue. We would expect that basics such as how to lay out an argument, how to address colleagues in an academic paper, the purpose of an abstract etc. are covered in all training courses.
Number of submissions – a number of papers from the autumn SEA Annual Conference will be published in the next summer edition. We are still experiencing a good mix of international and UK submissions. We have received some good original research papers and would like to continue to encourage debate/dialogue in the Journal. Articles that are a response to previous articles in the Journal will be published as close to the publication of the original article as possible, along with an optional reply to the response by the author of the original article.
The production process has been improved through the work of Katrina Pitts, who has been a great asset to the team.
Book review/marketing – Thanks to Martin Adams who continues to deal with distribution, advertising and book reviews, and who has agreed to act as the liaison between the Journal team and the main committee.
We also thank the Society for supporting our work.
Martin Adams, responsible for distribution and marketing and the Journal’s book reviews, reported that the readers’ panel is being streamlined to make the reading process more efficient and simultaneously more professional. There will be an expectation for those on the readers’ panel to read a certain number of papers per year and for that they will get their name printed in the journal. Martin urges everyone to write book reviews because they get a book they like for free, they get to practice writing, which can also count towards CPD hours. There is a list of books in the SEA Journal but we can also email Martin to ask to review a book we may be interested in which is not on the list, as long as it fulfils certain criteria.
h. Hermeneutic Circular editor: Susan Iacovou
Susan was editor of the Hermeneutic Circular for the past year but unfortunately due to other commitments she will have to step down after she produces the next Circular. She is happy to mentor anyone who wants to take over the role.
-
To re-elect the following Committee members:
iPaola Pomponi (Treasurer)
-
Digby Tantam (committee member)
-
Murray Blacket (conference organiser and webmaster)
7. Any other business.
Digby spoke about the 1st World Congress in Existential Psychotherapy, which will take place in May 2015. A venue is booked, a programme is being created, there are submissions being received from around the world and many key speakers have come on board. They would be delighted if Ernesto Spinelli joined them. There will be sessions on comparative methods, on research, on children and more are being put together. Not many people have signed up from the SEA, so far. Digby hopes more will join and that the SEA will participate. Derek Bean has already put a proposal together and will submit it via the official website, www.existentialpsychotherapy.net
Digby would like to ask anyone who is able to put up conference attendees to get in touch with the conference organisers, as quite a few people want to come but cannot afford accommodation. They are also looking for sponsors and perhaps the SEA would consider sponsoring a student or lecturer.
8. Closing remarks
Pavlos thanked everyone for coming to the AGM and asked people to make suggestions and to offer their ideas on what they want from the SEA but to also to get involved with it if they can.Digby proposed a vote of thanks for the SEA committee and all their work over the year.
9. Date of next AGM (to be announced)
Click here to see the AGM-Membership report